RSAC 2026 is a very important event for people who work in cybersecurity This article explores informa techtarget ai. . Expect to talk about new threats, new technologies, and ways to protect yourself from them.
Talking to CISOs gives you a better idea of what problems they are facing right now and what they want to focus on in the future. Informa TechTarget's AI assistant has carefully edited the transcript to make it easier to read and shorter. Jamison Cush, editor-in-chief of InformaTechTarget, says that the event gives a good look at how businesses deal with cybersecurity every year because it focuses so much on vendors. Since 2023, when products really started coming out, this is the most aggressive push I've seen for AI.
It's also important to note that there are no government officials present.
Even though I thought the sales sector would get smaller, I saw that advertising on cars is now very focused on artificial intelligence (AI). I don't think they're just dropping things on the ground. I believe their uses are much more complex and advanced, though.
Depending on who is in the audience, it seems like they want to implement, add to, replace, or even be all three at once. AC: The open-source code environment has had a lot of problems. Supply chain attacks are still a big problem. There is still good news about ransomware trends.
It looks like the focus has moved from encryption to simple ways to steal data. The change is mostly about stopping data theft instead of making things safer. Things have gotten better in this area.
Threat actors keep using old methods and taking advantage of weaknesses to get in. But we're also seeing more and more people using PowerShell in strange ways within their own systems. Emma Smith from Vodafone talked about the idea of "human in the loop," which means that people need to be involved in AI decisions.
Smith said that it doesn't work for bigger companies. The plan is to slowly give up more control over security measures, especially since there have been reports of threats caused by AI. What I don't understand is why so many businesses are pushing GenAI technology so hard. Even though they are trying, I can't figure out how these technologies are being used or put into practice.
Both sides talked about what they thought were the problems with systems that involve people.
It's a moment that makes you think about how security practices are changing. I'm not sure if the session will be a story or not, but I'm very interested in it. The difference between calling threats "boogeymen" and "patterns of activity" is more about language than about what we're talking about right now, but it's still an interesting area to look into more.
